← Back to Volume 17

A Comparative Study on Professional Identity and Teacher Professionalism between Chinese and Korean Pre-service Teachers: With a Discussion on the Limitations of Cross-Cultural Comparison

Zhiyang Li
pp.245-253 DOI: 10.62051/kcycbc35 August 27, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract: This study systematically investigates the structural characteristics, group differences, and cross-cultural measurement equivalence of professional identity and teacher professionalism among pre-service teachers in China and Korea. Drawing on a review of the literature, the study constructs a professional identity model encompassing four dimensions, namely professional value, professional affect, professional commitment, and professional behavioral tendency, as well as a teacher professionalism model covering four dimensions: knowledge base, pedagogical ethics, autonomous reflection, and collaborative development. A questionnaire survey was administered to approximately 600 pre-service teachers in each country, yielding a total of 1,182 valid responses. Using confirmatory factor analysis, multi-group measurement invariance testing, and structural equation modeling, the study estimates the reliability and validity of the scales in both national samples and examines configural, metric, and scalar invariance through chi-square difference tests and the "ΔCFI" criterion. Empirical results show that pre-service teachers in both countries demonstrate high levels of professional identity across all subdimensions; however, Chinese pre-service teachers score significantly higher than their Korean peers on the professional value and professional commitment dimensions, while Korean pre-service teachers score slightly higher on the autonomous reflection dimension of teacher professionalism. Measurement invariance testing supports only partial scalar invariance, indicating systematic intercept shifts for certain items across the two national contexts and suggesting that direct mean comparisons may be misleading. The study further discusses the limitations of cross-cultural comparison regarding theoretical assumptions, instrument adaptability, and interpretive boundaries, providing a methodological reference for international dialogue in future teacher education research.
Keywords: Pre-service teachers; Professional identity; Teacher professionalism; Measurement invariance; Cross-cultural comparison.
APA Citation: Zhiyang Li (2026). A Comparative Study on Professional Identity and Teacher Professionalism between Chinese and Korean Pre-service Teachers: With a Discussion on the Limitations of Cross-Cultural Comparison. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 17(1), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.62051/kcycbc35

References

  1. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.09.001
  2. Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.05.006
  3. Evetts, J. (2013). Professionalism: Value and ideology. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113480518
  4. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  5. Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.011
  6. Choi, L. J., & Park, M. Y. (2022). Teaching practicum during COVID-19: Pre-service English language teachers’ professional identities and motivation. SAGE Open, 12(3), 21582440221119472. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119472
  7. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage Publications.
  8. Zhang, C., Liu, Z., & Lo, N. P. K. (2024). The development and validation of the teacher professional identity scale in a Chinese university context. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0293156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293156
  9. So, K., & Kang, J. (2014). Curriculum reform in Korea: Issues and challenges for twenty-first century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40299-014-0079-9
  10. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  11. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  14. Park, H., & Byun, S. Y. (2015). Why some countries attract more high-ability young students to teaching: Cross-national comparisons of students’ expectation of becoming a teacher. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1086/681088
  15. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002